Skip to content
uswages .org

Physicists Salary: New Hampshire vs Oklahoma

Physicists earn a median of $214,030 in New Hampshire and $200,050 in Oklahoma. That is a nominal gap of $13,980 (+7.0%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$214,030
New Hampshire median
$205,472 after COL
$200,050
Oklahoma median
$227,736 after COL
+7.0%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-9.8%
Adjusted gap
Oklahoma leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $13,980 more per year than Oklahoma for physicists, a gap of +7.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oklahoma actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $22,264 more in national-price-level terms (a +9.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physicists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physicists

New Hampshire

Median salary
$214,030
Mean salary
$208,970
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.38
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$205,472
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physicists page for New Hampshire →

Physicists

Oklahoma

Median salary
$200,050
Mean salary
$162,530
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$227,736
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physicists page for Oklahoma →

Related pages

Keep digging into physicists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.