Skip to content
uswages .org

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Minnesota vs California

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $107,240 in Minnesota and $139,420 in California. That is a nominal gap of $32,180 (-23.1%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$107,240
Minnesota median
$108,740 after COL
$139,420
California median
$125,921 after COL
-23.1%
Nominal gap
California leads
-13.6%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $32,180 more per year than Minnesota for physics teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +23.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $17,182 of extra purchasing power (+13.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physics teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary

Minnesota

Median salary
$107,240
Mean salary
$118,530
Employment
250
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$108,740
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physics Teachers, Postsecondary page for Minnesota →

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary

California

Median salary
$139,420
Mean salary
$166,780
Employment
1,130
Location quotient
0.74
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$125,921
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physics Teachers, Postsecondary page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into physics teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.