Skip to content
uswages .org

Pipelayers Salary: Washington vs Minnesota

Pipelayers earn a median of $82,450 in Washington and $81,980 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $470 (+0.6%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$82,450
Washington median
$77,047 after COL
$81,980
Minnesota median
$83,126 after COL
+0.6%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-7.3%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $470 more per year than Minnesota for pipelayers, a gap of +0.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Minnesota actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $6,080 more in national-price-level terms (a +7.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for pipelayers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Pipelayers

Washington

Median salary
$82,450
Mean salary
$82,170
Employment
1,050
Location quotient
1.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$77,047
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pipelayers page for Washington →

Pipelayers

Minnesota

Median salary
$81,980
Mean salary
$85,080
Employment
510
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$83,126
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pipelayers page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into pipelayers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.