Skip to content
uswages .org

Plasterers And Stucco Masons Salary: Oregon vs New Hampshire

Plasterers And Stucco Masons earn a median of $71,180 in Oregon and $93,000 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $21,820 (-23.5%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$71,180
Oregon median
$68,865 after COL
$93,000
New Hampshire median
$89,281 after COL
-23.5%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-22.9%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $21,820 more per year than Oregon for plasterers and stucco masons, a gap of +23.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,416 of extra purchasing power (+22.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for plasterers and stucco masons in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Plasterers And Stucco Masons

Oregon

Median salary
$71,180
Mean salary
$71,250
Employment
170
Location quotient
0.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$68,865
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Plasterers And Stucco Masons page for Oregon →

Plasterers And Stucco Masons

New Hampshire

Median salary
$93,000
Mean salary
$84,590
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$89,281
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Plasterers And Stucco Masons page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into plasterers and stucco masons from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.