Skip to content
uswages .org

Podiatrists Salary: Minnesota vs District of Columbia

Podiatrists earn a median of $261,180 in Minnesota and $265,740 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $4,560 (-1.7%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$261,180
Minnesota median
$264,832 after COL
$265,740
District of Columbia median
$241,799 after COL
-1.7%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
+9.5%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $4,560 more per year than Minnesota for podiatrists, a gap of +1.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Minnesota actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $23,033 more in national-price-level terms (a +9.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for podiatrists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Podiatrists

Minnesota

Median salary
$261,180
Mean salary
$242,370
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$264,832
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Podiatrists page for Minnesota →

Podiatrists

District of Columbia

Median salary
$265,740
Mean salary
$231,170
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$241,799
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Podiatrists page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into podiatrists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.