Skip to content
uswages .org

Podiatrists Salary: New Hampshire vs Minnesota

Podiatrists earn a median of $250,070 in New Hampshire and $261,180 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $11,110 (-4.3%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$250,070
New Hampshire median
$240,071 after COL
$261,180
Minnesota median
$264,832 after COL
-4.3%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-9.3%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $11,110 more per year than New Hampshire for podiatrists, a gap of +4.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,761 of extra purchasing power (+9.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for podiatrists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Podiatrists

New Hampshire

Median salary
$250,070
Mean salary
$251,230
Employment
70
Location quotient
1.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$240,071
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Podiatrists page for New Hampshire →

Podiatrists

Minnesota

Median salary
$261,180
Mean salary
$242,370
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$264,832
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Podiatrists page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into podiatrists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.