Skip to content
uswages .org

Political Scientists Salary: Massachusetts vs Maryland

Political Scientists earn a median of $133,930 in Massachusetts and $153,380 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $19,450 (-12.7%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$133,930
Massachusetts median
$126,639 after COL
$153,380
Maryland median
$146,133 after COL
-12.7%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-13.3%
Adjusted gap
Maryland leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $19,450 more per year than Massachusetts for political scientists, a gap of +12.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maryland still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,494 of extra purchasing power (+13.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for political scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Political Scientists

Massachusetts

Median salary
$133,930
Mean salary
$139,440
Employment
170
Location quotient
1.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$126,639
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Political Scientists page for Massachusetts →

Political Scientists

Maryland

Median salary
$153,380
Mean salary
$148,440
Employment
100
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$146,133
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Political Scientists page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into political scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.