Skip to content
uswages .org

Political Scientists Salary: Ohio vs Colorado

Political Scientists earn a median of $119,370 in Ohio and $127,260 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $7,890 (-6.2%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$119,370
Ohio median
$128,668 after COL
$127,260
Colorado median
$123,491 after COL
-6.2%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
+4.2%
Adjusted gap
Ohio leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $7,890 more per year than Ohio for political scientists, a gap of +6.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Ohio actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $5,176 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.2% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for political scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Political Scientists

Ohio

Median salary
$119,370
Mean salary
$110,980
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.22
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$128,668
Regional Price Parity
92.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Political Scientists page for Ohio →

Political Scientists

Colorado

Median salary
$127,260
Mean salary
$128,590
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.32
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$123,491
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Political Scientists page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into political scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.