Skip to content
uswages .org

Pourers And Casters, Metal Salary: Tennessee vs Indiana

Pourers And Casters, Metal earn a median of $71,880 in Tennessee and $61,430 in Indiana. That is a nominal gap of $10,450 (+17.0%), with Tennessee paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$71,880
Tennessee median
$78,241 after COL
$61,430
Indiana median
$65,821 after COL
+17.0%
Nominal gap
Tennessee leads
+18.9%
Adjusted gap
Tennessee leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Tennessee pays $10,450 more per year than Indiana for pourers and casters, metal, a gap of +17.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Tennessee still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,420 of extra purchasing power (+18.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for pourers and casters, metal in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Pourers And Casters, Metal

Tennessee

Median salary
$71,880
Mean salary
$64,480
Employment
120
Location quotient
1.28
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$78,241
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pourers And Casters, Metal page for Tennessee →

Pourers And Casters, Metal

Indiana

Median salary
$61,430
Mean salary
$55,360
Employment
530
Location quotient
5.62
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$65,821
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pourers And Casters, Metal page for Indiana →

Related pages

Keep digging into pourers and casters, metal from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.