Skip to content
uswages .org

Power Plant Operators Salary: Nevada vs North Dakota

Power Plant Operators earn a median of $131,400 in Nevada and $122,160 in North Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $9,240 (+7.6%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$131,400
Nevada median
$131,428 after COL
$122,160
North Dakota median
$137,322 after COL
+7.6%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-4.3%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $9,240 more per year than North Dakota for power plant operators, a gap of +7.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. North Dakota actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $5,894 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for power plant operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Power Plant Operators

Nevada

Median salary
$131,400
Mean salary
$115,780
Employment
250
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$131,428
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Power Plant Operators page for Nevada →

Power Plant Operators

North Dakota

Median salary
$122,160
Mean salary
$116,410
Employment
150
Location quotient
1.89
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$137,322
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Power Plant Operators page for North Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into power plant operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.