Skip to content
uswages .org

Power Plant Operators Salary: Nevada vs Washington

Power Plant Operators earn a median of $131,400 in Nevada and $131,620 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $220 (-0.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$131,400
Nevada median
$131,428 after COL
$131,620
Washington median
$122,994 after COL
-0.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+6.9%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $220 more per year than Nevada for power plant operators, a gap of +0.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nevada actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $8,433 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for power plant operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Power Plant Operators

Nevada

Median salary
$131,400
Mean salary
$115,780
Employment
250
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$131,428
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Power Plant Operators page for Nevada →

Power Plant Operators

Washington

Median salary
$131,620
Mean salary
$128,230
Employment
430
Location quotient
0.65
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$122,994
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Power Plant Operators page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into power plant operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.