Skip to content
uswages .org

Print Binding And Finishing Workers Salary: Alaska vs Minnesota

Print Binding And Finishing Workers earn a median of $57,200 in Alaska and $48,390 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $8,810 (+18.2%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$57,200
Alaska median
$55,882 after COL
$48,390
Minnesota median
$49,067 after COL
+18.2%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
+13.9%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $8,810 more per year than Minnesota for print binding and finishing workers, a gap of +18.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,815 of extra purchasing power (+13.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for print binding and finishing workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Print Binding And Finishing Workers

Alaska

Median salary
$57,200
Mean salary
$48,450
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.44
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$55,882
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Print Binding And Finishing Workers page for Alaska →

Print Binding And Finishing Workers

Minnesota

Median salary
$48,390
Mean salary
$50,310
Employment
1,710
Location quotient
2.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$49,067
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Print Binding And Finishing Workers page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into print binding and finishing workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.