Skip to content
uswages .org

Print Binding And Finishing Workers Salary: Mississippi vs North Dakota

Print Binding And Finishing Workers earn a median of $91,850 in Mississippi and $48,760 in North Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $43,090 (+88.4%), with Mississippi paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$91,850
Mississippi median
$105,632 after COL
$48,760
North Dakota median
$54,812 after COL
+88.4%
Nominal gap
Mississippi leads
+92.7%
Adjusted gap
Mississippi leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Mississippi pays $43,090 more per year than North Dakota for print binding and finishing workers, a gap of +88.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Mississippi still comes out ahead, with roughly $50,820 of extra purchasing power (+92.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for print binding and finishing workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Print Binding And Finishing Workers

Mississippi

Median salary
$91,850
Mean salary
$79,910
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$105,632
Regional Price Parity
87.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Print Binding And Finishing Workers page for Mississippi →

Print Binding And Finishing Workers

North Dakota

Median salary
$48,760
Mean salary
$47,180
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$54,812
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Print Binding And Finishing Workers page for North Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into print binding and finishing workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.