Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Procurement Clerks Salary: Louisiana vs Alaska

Procurement Clerks earn a median of $47,480 in Louisiana and $54,800 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $7,320 (-13.4%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$47,480
Louisiana median
$53,828 after COL
$54,800
Alaska median
$53,537 after COL
-13.4%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
+0.5%
Adjusted gap
Louisiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $7,320 more per year than Louisiana for procurement clerks, a gap of +13.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Louisiana actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $291 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for procurement clerks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Procurement Clerks

Louisiana

Median salary
$47,480
Mean salary
$49,770
Employment
730
Location quotient
0.99
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$53,828
Regional Price Parity
88.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Procurement Clerks page for Louisiana →

Procurement Clerks

Alaska

Median salary
$54,800
Mean salary
$56,150
Employment
210
Location quotient
1.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$53,537
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Procurement Clerks page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into procurement clerks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.