Skip to content
uswages .org

Producers And Directors Salary: Illinois vs Oregon

Producers And Directors earn a median of $81,080 in Illinois and $87,460 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $6,380 (-7.3%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,080
Illinois median
$81,114 after COL
$87,460
Oregon median
$84,616 after COL
-7.3%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-4.1%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $6,380 more per year than Illinois for producers and directors, a gap of +7.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,502 of extra purchasing power (+4.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for producers and directors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Producers And Directors

Illinois

Median salary
$81,080
Mean salary
$95,920
Employment
3,170
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$81,114
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Producers And Directors page for Illinois →

Producers And Directors

Oregon

Median salary
$87,460
Mean salary
$95,710
Employment
1,640
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$84,616
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Producers And Directors page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into producers and directors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.