Skip to content
uswages .org

Producers And Directors Salary: Rhode Island vs New Jersey

Producers And Directors earn a median of $84,250 in Rhode Island and $119,840 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $35,590 (-29.7%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$84,250
Rhode Island median
$82,372 after COL
$119,840
New Jersey median
$110,142 after COL
-29.7%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-25.2%
Adjusted gap
New Jersey leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $35,590 more per year than Rhode Island for producers and directors, a gap of +29.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Jersey still comes out ahead, with roughly $27,770 of extra purchasing power (+25.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for producers and directors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Producers And Directors

Rhode Island

Median salary
$84,250
Mean salary
$90,730
Employment
560
Location quotient
1.20
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$82,372
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Producers And Directors page for Rhode Island →

Producers And Directors

New Jersey

Median salary
$119,840
Mean salary
$124,310
Employment
2,970
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$110,142
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Producers And Directors page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into producers and directors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.