Skip to content
uswages .org

Producers And Directors Salary: Texas vs District of Columbia

Producers And Directors earn a median of $71,710 in Texas and $104,270 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $32,560 (-31.2%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$71,710
Texas median
$73,884 after COL
$104,270
District of Columbia median
$94,876 after COL
-31.2%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-22.1%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $32,560 more per year than Texas for producers and directors, a gap of +31.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,992 of extra purchasing power (+22.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for producers and directors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Producers And Directors

Texas

Median salary
$71,710
Mean salary
$85,080
Employment
6,610
Location quotient
0.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$73,884
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Producers And Directors page for Texas →

Producers And Directors

District of Columbia

Median salary
$104,270
Mean salary
$115,040
Employment
2,640
Location quotient
4.09
Jobs per 1,000
3.8
COL-adjusted median
$94,876
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Producers And Directors page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into producers and directors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.