Skip to content
uswages .org

Property Appraisers And Assessors Salary: Connecticut vs Washington

Property Appraisers And Assessors earn a median of $86,050 in Connecticut and $83,710 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $2,340 (+2.8%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$86,050
Connecticut median
$83,052 after COL
$83,710
Washington median
$78,224 after COL
+2.8%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
+6.2%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $2,340 more per year than Washington for property appraisers and assessors, a gap of +2.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,828 of extra purchasing power (+6.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for property appraisers and assessors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Property Appraisers And Assessors

Connecticut

Median salary
$86,050
Mean salary
$93,760
Employment
630
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$83,052
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Property Appraisers And Assessors page for Connecticut →

Property Appraisers And Assessors

Washington

Median salary
$83,710
Mean salary
$87,310
Employment
1,150
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$78,224
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Property Appraisers And Assessors page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into property appraisers and assessors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.