Skip to content
uswages .org

Psychiatric Technicians Salary: Washington vs Oregon

Psychiatric Technicians earn a median of $52,470 in Washington and $59,820 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $7,350 (-12.3%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$52,470
Washington median
$49,031 after COL
$59,820
Oregon median
$57,875 after COL
-12.3%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-15.3%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $7,350 more per year than Washington for psychiatric technicians, a gap of +12.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,843 of extra purchasing power (+15.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for psychiatric technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Psychiatric Technicians

Washington

Median salary
$52,470
Mean salary
$55,160
Employment
1,920
Location quotient
0.54
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$49,031
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Psychiatric Technicians page for Washington →

Psychiatric Technicians

Oregon

Median salary
$59,820
Mean salary
$58,140
Employment
1,250
Location quotient
0.63
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$57,875
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Psychiatric Technicians page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into psychiatric technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.