Skip to content
uswages .org

Purchasing Managers Salary: New Jersey vs Massachusetts

Purchasing Managers earn a median of $174,520 in New Jersey and $170,750 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $3,770 (+2.2%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$174,520
New Jersey median
$160,397 after COL
$170,750
Massachusetts median
$161,455 after COL
+2.2%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-0.7%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $3,770 more per year than Massachusetts for purchasing managers, a gap of +2.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Massachusetts actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,058 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for purchasing managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Purchasing Managers

New Jersey

Median salary
$174,520
Mean salary
$186,350
Employment
3,430
Location quotient
1.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$160,397
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Purchasing Managers page for New Jersey →

Purchasing Managers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$170,750
Mean salary
$179,070
Employment
2,160
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$161,455
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Purchasing Managers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into purchasing managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.