Skip to content
uswages .org

Radiologists Salary: Florida vs Minnesota

Radiologists earn a median of $417,690 in Florida and $708,340 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $290,650 (-41.0%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$417,690
Florida median
$403,901 after COL
$708,340
Minnesota median
$718,245 after COL
-41.0%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-43.8%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $290,650 more per year than Florida for radiologists, a gap of +41.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $314,344 of extra purchasing power (+43.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for radiologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Radiologists

Florida

Median salary
$417,690
Mean salary
$434,010
Employment
1,680
Location quotient
0.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$403,901
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Radiologists page for Florida →

Radiologists

Minnesota

Median salary
$708,340
Mean salary
$527,740
Employment
440
Location quotient
0.87
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$718,245
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Radiologists page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into radiologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.