Skip to content
uswages .org

Radiologists Salary: Iowa vs New Hampshire

Radiologists earn a median of $405,220 in Iowa and $506,010 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $100,790 (-19.9%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$405,220
Iowa median
$461,726 after COL
$506,010
New Hampshire median
$485,777 after COL
-19.9%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-5.0%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $100,790 more per year than Iowa for radiologists, a gap of +19.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,051 of extra purchasing power (+5.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for radiologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Radiologists

Iowa

Median salary
$405,220
Mean salary
$344,000
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$461,726
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Radiologists page for Iowa →

Radiologists

New Hampshire

Median salary
$506,010
Mean salary
$447,500
Employment
210
Location quotient
1.76
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$485,777
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Radiologists page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into radiologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.