Skip to content
uswages .org

Radiologists Salary: North Dakota vs New Hampshire

Radiologists earn a median of $553,140 in North Dakota and $506,010 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $47,130 (+9.3%), with North Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$553,140
North Dakota median
$621,792 after COL
$506,010
New Hampshire median
$485,777 after COL
+9.3%
Nominal gap
North Dakota leads
+28.0%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Dakota pays $47,130 more per year than New Hampshire for radiologists, a gap of +9.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $136,015 of extra purchasing power (+28.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for radiologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Radiologists

North Dakota

Median salary
$553,140
Mean salary
$556,170
Employment
120
Location quotient
1.68
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$621,792
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Radiologists page for North Dakota →

Radiologists

New Hampshire

Median salary
$506,010
Mean salary
$447,500
Employment
210
Location quotient
1.76
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$485,777
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Radiologists page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into radiologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.