Skip to content
uswages .org

Real Estate Brokers Salary: Alabama vs Washington

Real Estate Brokers earn a median of $82,630 in Alabama and $82,790 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $160 (-0.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$82,630
Alabama median
$93,028 after COL
$82,790
Washington median
$77,364 after COL
-0.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+20.2%
Adjusted gap
Alabama leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $160 more per year than Alabama for real estate brokers, a gap of +0.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Alabama actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $15,663 more in national-price-level terms (a +20.2% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for real estate brokers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Real Estate Brokers

Alabama

Median salary
$82,630
Mean salary
$76,830
Employment
460
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$93,028
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Real Estate Brokers page for Alabama →

Real Estate Brokers

Washington

Median salary
$82,790
Mean salary
$89,720
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$77,364
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Real Estate Brokers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into real estate brokers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.