Skip to content
uswages .org

Real Estate Sales Agents Salary: Nevada vs Montana

Real Estate Sales Agents earn a median of $79,990 in Nevada and $79,100 in Montana. That is a nominal gap of $890 (+1.1%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$79,990
Nevada median
$80,007 after COL
$79,100
Montana median
$83,575 after COL
+1.1%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-4.3%
Adjusted gap
Montana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $890 more per year than Montana for real estate sales agents, a gap of +1.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Montana actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,569 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for real estate sales agents in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Real Estate Sales Agents

Nevada

Median salary
$79,990
Mean salary
$83,470
Employment
1,490
Location quotient
0.77
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$80,007
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Real Estate Sales Agents page for Nevada →

Real Estate Sales Agents

Montana

Median salary
$79,100
Mean salary
$89,580
Employment
370
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$83,575
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Real Estate Sales Agents page for Montana →

Related pages

Keep digging into real estate sales agents from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.