Skip to content
uswages .org

Recreation Workers Salary: Oregon vs South Dakota

Recreation Workers earn a median of $39,610 in Oregon and $42,270 in South Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $2,660 (-6.3%), with South Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$39,610
Oregon median
$38,322 after COL
$42,270
South Dakota median
$47,716 after COL
-6.3%
Nominal gap
South Dakota leads
-19.7%
Adjusted gap
South Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, South Dakota pays $2,660 more per year than Oregon for recreation workers, a gap of +6.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, South Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,394 of extra purchasing power (+19.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for recreation workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Recreation Workers

Oregon

Median salary
$39,610
Mean salary
$42,990
Employment
4,640
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
2.4
COL-adjusted median
$38,322
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Recreation Workers page for Oregon →

Recreation Workers

South Dakota

Median salary
$42,270
Mean salary
$44,200
Employment
650
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$47,716
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Recreation Workers page for South Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into recreation workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.