Skip to content
uswages .org

Reinforcing Iron And Rebar Workers Salary: Wisconsin vs Nevada

Reinforcing Iron And Rebar Workers earn a median of $121,620 in Wisconsin and $102,130 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $19,490 (+19.1%), with Wisconsin paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$121,620
Wisconsin median
$129,252 after COL
$102,130
Nevada median
$102,151 after COL
+19.1%
Nominal gap
Wisconsin leads
+26.5%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wisconsin pays $19,490 more per year than Nevada for reinforcing iron and rebar workers, a gap of +19.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wisconsin still comes out ahead, with roughly $27,101 of extra purchasing power (+26.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for reinforcing iron and rebar workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Reinforcing Iron And Rebar Workers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$121,620
Mean salary
$102,070
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.20
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$129,252
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Reinforcing Iron And Rebar Workers page for Wisconsin →

Reinforcing Iron And Rebar Workers

Nevada

Median salary
$102,130
Mean salary
$89,870
Employment
460
Location quotient
3.37
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$102,151
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Reinforcing Iron And Rebar Workers page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into reinforcing iron and rebar workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.