Skip to content
uswages .org

Residential Advisors Salary: North Dakota vs Montana

Residential Advisors earn a median of $48,590 in North Dakota and $47,230 in Montana. That is a nominal gap of $1,360 (+2.9%), with North Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,590
North Dakota median
$54,621 after COL
$47,230
Montana median
$49,902 after COL
+2.9%
Nominal gap
North Dakota leads
+9.5%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Dakota pays $1,360 more per year than Montana for residential advisors, a gap of +2.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,718 of extra purchasing power (+9.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for residential advisors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Residential Advisors

North Dakota

Median salary
$48,590
Mean salary
$49,220
Employment
260
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$54,621
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Residential Advisors page for North Dakota →

Residential Advisors

Montana

Median salary
$47,230
Mean salary
$48,340
Employment
350
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$49,902
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Residential Advisors page for Montana →

Related pages

Keep digging into residential advisors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.