Skip to content
uswages .org

Retail Salespersons Salary: Durham-Chapel Hill, NC vs Napa, CA

Retail Salespersons earn a median of $31,790 in Durham-Chapel Hill, NC and $40,780 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $8,990 (-22.0%), with Napa, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$31,790
Durham-Chapel Hill, NC median
$32,581 after COL
$40,780
Napa, CA median
$36,231 after COL
-22.0%
Nominal gap
Napa, CA leads
-10.1%
Adjusted gap
Napa, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Napa, CA pays $8,990 more per year than Durham-Chapel Hill, NC for retail salespersons, a gap of +22.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Napa, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,650 of extra purchasing power (+10.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for retail salespersons in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Retail Salespersons

Durham-Chapel Hill, NC

Median salary
$31,790
Mean salary
$34,360
Employment
5,850
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
17.0
COL-adjusted median
$32,581
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Retail Salespersons page for Durham-Chapel Hill, NC →

Retail Salespersons

Napa, CA

Median salary
$40,780
Mean salary
$45,630
Employment
2,150
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
27.6
COL-adjusted median
$36,231
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Retail Salespersons page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into retail salespersons from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.