Skip to content
uswages .org

Retail Salespersons Salary: New Mexico vs Hawaii

Retail Salespersons earn a median of $33,300 in New Mexico and $37,790 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $4,490 (-11.9%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$33,300
New Mexico median
$36,112 after COL
$37,790
Hawaii median
$34,370 after COL
-11.9%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
+5.1%
Adjusted gap
New Mexico leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $4,490 more per year than New Mexico for retail salespersons, a gap of +11.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. New Mexico actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,743 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for retail salespersons in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Retail Salespersons

New Mexico

Median salary
$33,300
Mean salary
$35,500
Employment
23,800
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
27.3
COL-adjusted median
$36,112
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Retail Salespersons page for New Mexico →

Retail Salespersons

Hawaii

Median salary
$37,790
Mean salary
$40,520
Employment
19,180
Location quotient
1.22
Jobs per 1,000
30.6
COL-adjusted median
$34,370
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Retail Salespersons page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into retail salespersons from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.