Skip to content
uswages .org

Rock Splitters, Quarry Salary: California vs Wisconsin

Rock Splitters, Quarry earn a median of $61,620 in California and $62,000 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $380 (-0.6%), with Wisconsin paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$61,620
California median
$55,654 after COL
$62,000
Wisconsin median
$65,891 after COL
-0.6%
Nominal gap
Wisconsin leads
-15.5%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wisconsin pays $380 more per year than California for rock splitters, quarry, a gap of +0.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wisconsin still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,237 of extra purchasing power (+15.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for rock splitters, quarry in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Rock Splitters, Quarry

California

Median salary
$61,620
Mean salary
$66,660
Employment
290
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$55,654
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Rock Splitters, Quarry page for California →

Rock Splitters, Quarry

Wisconsin

Median salary
$62,000
Mean salary
$71,380
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$65,891
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Rock Splitters, Quarry page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into rock splitters, quarry from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.