Skip to content
uswages .org

Rock Splitters, Quarry Salary: Vermont vs Wisconsin

Rock Splitters, Quarry earn a median of $65,420 in Vermont and $62,000 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $3,420 (+5.5%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,420
Vermont median
$66,784 after COL
$62,000
Wisconsin median
$65,891 after COL
+5.5%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
+1.4%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $3,420 more per year than Wisconsin for rock splitters, quarry, a gap of +5.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $893 of extra purchasing power (+1.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for rock splitters, quarry in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Rock Splitters, Quarry

Vermont

Median salary
$65,420
Mean salary
$65,530
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$66,784
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Rock Splitters, Quarry page for Vermont →

Rock Splitters, Quarry

Wisconsin

Median salary
$62,000
Mean salary
$71,380
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$65,891
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Rock Splitters, Quarry page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into rock splitters, quarry from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.