Skip to content
uswages .org

School Bus Monitors Salary: Minnesota vs Vermont

School Bus Monitors earn a median of $38,590 in Minnesota and $39,020 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $430 (-1.1%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$38,590
Minnesota median
$39,130 after COL
$39,020
Vermont median
$39,833 after COL
-1.1%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-1.8%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $430 more per year than Minnesota for school bus monitors, a gap of +1.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $704 of extra purchasing power (+1.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for school bus monitors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

School Bus Monitors

Minnesota

Median salary
$38,590
Mean salary
$38,740
Employment
790
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$39,130
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full School Bus Monitors page for Minnesota →

School Bus Monitors

Vermont

Median salary
$39,020
Mean salary
$40,470
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.45
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$39,833
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full School Bus Monitors page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into school bus monitors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.