Skip to content
uswages .org

Security Guards Salary: Massachusetts vs Vermont

Security Guards earn a median of $44,670 in Massachusetts and $45,550 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $880 (-1.9%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,670
Massachusetts median
$42,238 after COL
$45,550
Vermont median
$46,500 after COL
-1.9%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-9.2%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $880 more per year than Massachusetts for security guards, a gap of +1.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,261 of extra purchasing power (+9.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for security guards in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Security Guards

Massachusetts

Median salary
$44,670
Mean salary
$44,760
Employment
23,930
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
6.6
COL-adjusted median
$42,238
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Security Guards page for Massachusetts →

Security Guards

Vermont

Median salary
$45,550
Mean salary
$50,770
Employment
930
Location quotient
0.37
Jobs per 1,000
3.1
COL-adjusted median
$46,500
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Security Guards page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into security guards from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.