Skip to content
uswages .org

Self-Enrichment Teachers Salary: New York vs Vermont

Self-Enrichment Teachers earn a median of $57,790 in New York and $53,190 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $4,600 (+8.6%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$57,790
New York median
$53,548 after COL
$53,190
Vermont median
$54,299 after COL
+8.6%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-1.4%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $4,600 more per year than Vermont for self-enrichment teachers, a gap of +8.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $750 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.4% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for self-enrichment teachers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Self-Enrichment Teachers

New York

Median salary
$57,790
Mean salary
$70,270
Employment
31,120
Location quotient
1.50
Jobs per 1,000
3.2
COL-adjusted median
$53,548
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Self-Enrichment Teachers page for New York →

Self-Enrichment Teachers

Vermont

Median salary
$53,190
Mean salary
$65,900
Employment
1,190
Location quotient
1.84
Jobs per 1,000
3.9
COL-adjusted median
$54,299
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Self-Enrichment Teachers page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into self-enrichment teachers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.