Skip to content
uswages .org

Self-Enrichment Teachers Salary: Oregon vs District of Columbia

Self-Enrichment Teachers earn a median of $53,790 in Oregon and $66,430 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $12,640 (-19.0%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$53,790
Oregon median
$52,041 after COL
$66,430
District of Columbia median
$60,445 after COL
-19.0%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-13.9%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $12,640 more per year than Oregon for self-enrichment teachers, a gap of +19.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,404 of extra purchasing power (+13.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for self-enrichment teachers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Self-Enrichment Teachers

Oregon

Median salary
$53,790
Mean salary
$54,240
Employment
5,580
Location quotient
1.33
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$52,041
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Self-Enrichment Teachers page for Oregon →

Self-Enrichment Teachers

District of Columbia

Median salary
$66,430
Mean salary
$70,820
Employment
600
Location quotient
0.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$60,445
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Self-Enrichment Teachers page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into self-enrichment teachers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.