Skip to content
uswages .org

Sewing Machine Operators Salary: Alaska vs Massachusetts

Sewing Machine Operators earn a median of $43,850 in Alaska and $42,910 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $940 (+2.2%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$43,850
Alaska median
$42,839 after COL
$42,910
Massachusetts median
$40,574 after COL
+2.2%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
+5.6%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $940 more per year than Massachusetts for sewing machine operators, a gap of +2.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,265 of extra purchasing power (+5.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for sewing machine operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Sewing Machine Operators

Alaska

Median salary
$43,850
Mean salary
$46,300
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$42,839
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sewing Machine Operators page for Alaska →

Sewing Machine Operators

Massachusetts

Median salary
$42,910
Mean salary
$42,850
Employment
1,540
Location quotient
0.63
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$40,574
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sewing Machine Operators page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into sewing machine operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.