Skip to content
uswages .org

Sewing Machine Operators Salary: Maine vs Washington

Sewing Machine Operators earn a median of $43,520 in Maine and $43,360 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $160 (+0.4%), with Maine paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$43,520
Maine median
$44,843 after COL
$43,360
Washington median
$40,518 after COL
+0.4%
Nominal gap
Maine leads
+10.7%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maine pays $160 more per year than Washington for sewing machine operators, a gap of +0.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maine still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,324 of extra purchasing power (+10.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for sewing machine operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Sewing Machine Operators

Maine

Median salary
$43,520
Mean salary
$42,450
Employment
700
Location quotient
1.63
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$44,843
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sewing Machine Operators page for Maine →

Sewing Machine Operators

Washington

Median salary
$43,360
Mean salary
$43,720
Employment
1,600
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$40,518
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sewing Machine Operators page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into sewing machine operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.