Skip to content
uswages .org

Shampooers Salary: Pennsylvania vs Massachusetts

Shampooers earn a median of $26,130 in Pennsylvania and $34,840 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $8,710 (-25.0%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$26,130
Pennsylvania median
$26,780 after COL
$34,840
Massachusetts median
$32,943 after COL
-25.0%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-18.7%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $8,710 more per year than Pennsylvania for shampooers, a gap of +25.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,163 of extra purchasing power (+18.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for shampooers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Shampooers

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$26,130
Mean salary
$26,880
Employment
1,000
Location quotient
3.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$26,780
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Shampooers page for Pennsylvania →

Shampooers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$34,840
Mean salary
$34,420
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$32,943
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Shampooers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into shampooers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.