Skip to content
uswages .org

Sheet Metal Workers Salary: Illinois vs Connecticut

Sheet Metal Workers earn a median of $86,630 in Illinois and $78,750 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $7,880 (+10.0%), with Illinois paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$86,630
Illinois median
$86,666 after COL
$78,750
Connecticut median
$76,006 after COL
+10.0%
Nominal gap
Illinois leads
+14.0%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Illinois pays $7,880 more per year than Connecticut for sheet metal workers, a gap of +10.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Illinois still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,660 of extra purchasing power (+14.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for sheet metal workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Sheet Metal Workers

Illinois

Median salary
$86,630
Mean salary
$81,960
Employment
3,260
Location quotient
0.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$86,666
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sheet Metal Workers page for Illinois →

Sheet Metal Workers

Connecticut

Median salary
$78,750
Mean salary
$74,720
Employment
1,480
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$76,006
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sheet Metal Workers page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into sheet metal workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.