Skip to content
uswages .org

Sheet Metal Workers Salary: Massachusetts vs Alaska

Sheet Metal Workers earn a median of $82,100 in Massachusetts and $94,600 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $12,500 (-13.2%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$82,100
Massachusetts median
$77,631 after COL
$94,600
Alaska median
$92,420 after COL
-13.2%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-16.0%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $12,500 more per year than Massachusetts for sheet metal workers, a gap of +13.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $14,789 of extra purchasing power (+16.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for sheet metal workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Sheet Metal Workers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$82,100
Mean salary
$78,900
Employment
2,890
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$77,631
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sheet Metal Workers page for Massachusetts →

Sheet Metal Workers

Alaska

Median salary
$94,600
Mean salary
$83,980
Employment
240
Location quotient
0.95
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$92,420
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sheet Metal Workers page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into sheet metal workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.