Skip to content
uswages .org

Shoe And Leather Workers And Repairers Salary: Massachusetts vs Wisconsin

Shoe And Leather Workers And Repairers earn a median of $46,550 in Massachusetts and $44,000 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $2,550 (+5.8%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,550
Massachusetts median
$44,016 after COL
$44,000
Wisconsin median
$46,761 after COL
+5.8%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-5.9%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $2,550 more per year than Wisconsin for shoe and leather workers and repairers, a gap of +5.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wisconsin actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,745 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for shoe and leather workers and repairers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Shoe And Leather Workers And Repairers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$46,550
Mean salary
$47,220
Employment
500
Location quotient
2.85
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$44,016
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Shoe And Leather Workers And Repairers page for Massachusetts →

Shoe And Leather Workers And Repairers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$44,000
Mean salary
$41,830
Employment
460
Location quotient
3.25
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$46,761
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Shoe And Leather Workers And Repairers page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into shoe and leather workers and repairers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.