Skip to content
uswages .org

Social Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary, All Other Salary: New Mexico vs Michigan

Social Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary, All Other earn a median of $89,860 in New Mexico and $97,450 in Michigan. That is a nominal gap of $7,590 (-7.8%), with Michigan paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$89,860
New Mexico median
$97,449 after COL
$97,450
Michigan median
$101,281 after COL
-7.8%
Nominal gap
Michigan leads
-3.8%
Adjusted gap
Michigan leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Michigan pays $7,590 more per year than New Mexico for social sciences teachers, postsecondary, all other, a gap of +7.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Michigan still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,832 of extra purchasing power (+3.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for social sciences teachers, postsecondary, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Social Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary, All Other

New Mexico

Median salary
$89,860
Mean salary
$82,790
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$97,449
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Social Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary, All Other page for New Mexico →

Social Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary, All Other

Michigan

Median salary
$97,450
Mean salary
$103,300
Employment
220
Location quotient
0.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$101,281
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Social Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary, All Other page for Michigan →

Related pages

Keep digging into social sciences teachers, postsecondary, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.