Skip to content
uswages .org

Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Connecticut vs California

Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $101,490 in Connecticut and $127,680 in California. That is a nominal gap of $26,190 (-20.5%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$101,490
Connecticut median
$97,954 after COL
$127,680
California median
$115,318 after COL
-20.5%
Nominal gap
California leads
-15.1%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $26,190 more per year than Connecticut for sociology teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +20.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $17,364 of extra purchasing power (+15.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for sociology teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary

Connecticut

Median salary
$101,490
Mean salary
$121,980
Employment
320
Location quotient
2.48
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$97,954
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary page for Connecticut →

Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary

California

Median salary
$127,680
Mean salary
$138,470
Employment
810
Location quotient
0.59
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$115,318
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into sociology teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.