Skip to content
uswages .org

Software Developers Salary: California vs Texas

Software Developers earn a median of $174,410 in California and $132,150 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $42,260 (+32.0%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$174,410
California median
$157,523 after COL
$132,150
Texas median
$136,157 after COL
+32.0%
Nominal gap
California leads
+15.7%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $42,260 more per year than Texas for software developers, a gap of +32.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $21,366 of extra purchasing power (+15.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for software developers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Software Developers

California

Median salary
$174,410
Mean salary
$186,770
Employment
284,390
Location quotient
1.44
Jobs per 1,000
15.6
COL-adjusted median
$157,523
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Software Developers page for California →

Software Developers

Texas

Median salary
$132,150
Mean salary
$136,450
Employment
163,880
Location quotient
1.07
Jobs per 1,000
11.6
COL-adjusted median
$136,157
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Software Developers page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into software developers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.