Skip to content
uswages .org

Software Quality Assurance Analysts And Testers Salary: New York vs New Jersey

Software Quality Assurance Analysts And Testers earn a median of $121,240 in New York and $119,470 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $1,770 (+1.5%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$121,240
New York median
$112,341 after COL
$119,470
New Jersey median
$109,802 after COL
+1.5%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+2.3%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $1,770 more per year than New Jersey for software quality assurance analysts and testers, a gap of +1.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,539 of extra purchasing power (+2.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for software quality assurance analysts and testers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Software Quality Assurance Analysts And Testers

New York

Median salary
$121,240
Mean salary
$122,950
Employment
10,460
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$112,341
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Software Quality Assurance Analysts And Testers page for New York →

Software Quality Assurance Analysts And Testers

New Jersey

Median salary
$119,470
Mean salary
$120,550
Employment
6,550
Location quotient
1.27
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$109,802
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Software Quality Assurance Analysts And Testers page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into software quality assurance analysts and testers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.