Skip to content
uswages .org

Soil And Plant Scientists Salary: North Dakota vs Alaska

Soil And Plant Scientists earn a median of $65,320 in North Dakota and $100,320 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $35,000 (-34.9%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,320
North Dakota median
$73,427 after COL
$100,320
Alaska median
$98,008 after COL
-34.9%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-25.1%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $35,000 more per year than North Dakota for soil and plant scientists, a gap of +34.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,581 of extra purchasing power (+25.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for soil and plant scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Soil And Plant Scientists

North Dakota

Median salary
$65,320
Mean salary
$77,170
Employment
410
Location quotient
9.50
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$73,427
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Soil And Plant Scientists page for North Dakota →

Soil And Plant Scientists

Alaska

Median salary
$100,320
Mean salary
$102,230
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.92
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$98,008
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Soil And Plant Scientists page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into soil and plant scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.