Skip to content
uswages .org

Special Education Teachers, Middle School Salary: New York vs Alaska

Special Education Teachers, Middle School earn a median of $93,820 in New York and $81,000 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $12,820 (+15.8%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$93,820
New York median
$86,934 after COL
$81,000
Alaska median
$79,133 after COL
+15.8%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+9.9%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $12,820 more per year than Alaska for special education teachers, middle school, a gap of +15.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,801 of extra purchasing power (+9.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for special education teachers, middle school in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Special Education Teachers, Middle School

New York

Median salary
$93,820
Mean salary
$92,940
Employment
7,870
Location quotient
1.33
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$86,934
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Special Education Teachers, Middle School page for New York →

Special Education Teachers, Middle School

Alaska

Median salary
$81,000
Mean salary
$81,120
Employment
200
Location quotient
0.99
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$79,133
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Special Education Teachers, Middle School page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into special education teachers, middle school from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.