Skip to content
uswages .org

Speech-Language Pathologists Salary: District of Columbia vs California

Speech-Language Pathologists earn a median of $109,380 in District of Columbia and $118,970 in California. That is a nominal gap of $9,590 (-8.1%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$109,380
District of Columbia median
$99,526 after COL
$118,970
California median
$107,451 after COL
-8.1%
Nominal gap
California leads
-7.4%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $9,590 more per year than District of Columbia for speech-language pathologists, a gap of +8.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,925 of extra purchasing power (+7.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for speech-language pathologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Speech-Language Pathologists

District of Columbia

Median salary
$109,380
Mean salary
$112,940
Employment
390
Location quotient
0.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$99,526
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Speech-Language Pathologists page for District of Columbia →

Speech-Language Pathologists

California

Median salary
$118,970
Mean salary
$118,600
Employment
16,930
Location quotient
0.79
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$107,451
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Speech-Language Pathologists page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into speech-language pathologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.