Skip to content
uswages .org

Structural Iron And Steel Workers Salary: Massachusetts vs New Jersey

Structural Iron And Steel Workers earn a median of $120,840 in Massachusetts and $113,220 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $7,620 (+6.7%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$120,840
Massachusetts median
$114,262 after COL
$113,220
New Jersey median
$104,058 after COL
+6.7%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+9.8%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $7,620 more per year than New Jersey for structural iron and steel workers, a gap of +6.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,204 of extra purchasing power (+9.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for structural iron and steel workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Structural Iron And Steel Workers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$120,840
Mean salary
$113,290
Employment
2,050
Location quotient
1.28
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$114,262
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Structural Iron And Steel Workers page for Massachusetts →

Structural Iron And Steel Workers

New Jersey

Median salary
$113,220
Mean salary
$112,660
Employment
1,060
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$104,058
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Structural Iron And Steel Workers page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into structural iron and steel workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.